Drawing for GEAR HOCKEY

USPTO serial 75459793

GEAR HOCKEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GEAR HOCKEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT J SCHAAP

21241 VENTURA BLVD STE 188WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364-2109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028SPORTING GOODS FOR ICE HOCKEY AND ROLLER HOCKEY, NAMELY, SKATES, PROTECTIVE PADS FOR SHOULDERS AND ELBOWS, HARD SHELL GLOVES FOR HOCKEY, GOAL KEEPER PADS, BLOCKER MITTENS, PUCKS, STICKS, BALLS AND HOCKEY SKATE BLADESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 29, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 21, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 22, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance