Drawing for VIRTUAL FASHION

USPTO serial 75459912

VIRTUAL FASHION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL FASHION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE W HOOVER

GEORGE W HOOVER BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for consumer use in shopping via a global computer network and computer software for providing fashion, beauty and shopping adviceACTIVE
035Electronic retailing services via a global computer network featuring apparel, fashion, accessories, personal care items, jewelry and cosmeticsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 12, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 12, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jun 1, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Feb 17, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 23, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance