USPTO serial 75460092
CUSTOM DINING SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2414792Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 2000
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CUSTOM DINING SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ROSEMONT, IL
North Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
ROSEMONT, IL
ROSEMONT, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clay A. Tillack
Clay A. Tillack Schiff Hardin LLPP.O. Box 06079Chicago, IL 60606-0079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | contract food services for institutional customers, namely, colleges and universities; food nutrition consultation services, namely, menu planning; design services for institutional kitchens, namely, design of displays and promotional materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 10, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by E & H Distributing Co.
- Other trademarks owned by E & H Distributing Co.
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CUSTOM DINING SERVICES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 27, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 8, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |