Drawing for RAGIN' CAJUN

USPTO serial 75460134

RAGIN' CAJUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAGIN' CAJUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANET DORE

JANET DORE MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant and food take out servicesACTIVEJun 14, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 6, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 6, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance