Drawing for CAMP BEVERLY HILLS

USPTO serial 75460350

CAMP BEVERLY HILLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, CHRISTINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAMP BEVERLY HILLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD J SHIRE

HOWARD J SHIRE KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, fragrances and personal care products, namely, perfume, cologne, after-shave lotion, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder, non-medicated bath salts, body and skin cream, body powder, bubble bath, facial scrubs, shampoo, hair conditioner, hairspray, hand cream, make-up, skin moisturizer, body massage oil, shaving cream, shaving lotion, skin soaps, skin moisturizer, toilet water and toothpasteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 14, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 2, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 26, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 11, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 2, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 14, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 8, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 17, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance