USPTO serial 75460525
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DIAMOND AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES INC.
London, Ontario N5V 1 S2, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Trybus
STEVEN R TRYBUS ROPER & QUIGG200 S MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | a fixed flight trainer comprised of a visual display screen, a sound system, aircraft controls, and a panel of aircraft instruments connected to an controlled by one or more computers and related computer programs | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1997 |
| 016 | Flight training manuals | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1997 |
| 041 | operation of a flight training school | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |