Drawing for ECRC ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESOURCE CENTER AND DESIGN

USPTO serial 75460598

ECRC ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESOURCE CENTER AND DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WARD, JOYCE A.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECRC ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESOURCE CENTER AND DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Young

MARK J YOUNG DRAUGHON PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONONE INDEPENDENT DR STE 2000JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Electronic commerce services, namely, consulting, research, product development in the field of electronic commerce and promoting public awareness of the need for electronic commerceACTIVEMay 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 1999IURFIU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1999IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Aug 17, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance