Drawing for PULSO LATINO

USPTO serial 75460606

PULSO LATINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PULSO LATINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jorge Arciniega

Jorge Arciniega Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others through radio commercialsACTIVE—
038Radio broadcasting servicesACTIVE—
041Education and entertainment services in the nature of radio programs featuring music, news, talk shows, listener call-ins, contests and traffic reportsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 7, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 7, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Apr 10, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 9, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 9, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 17, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 1, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance