USPTO serial 75460683
ROMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3152421Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 2006
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newwark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1XG, GB
Newwark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1XG, GB
Newwark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1XG, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gabrielle S. Roth
Gabrielle S. Roth DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 EYE STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-5403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER FIRMWARE FOR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF TRANSMISSIONS FOR USE IN GROUND VEHICLES, AIRCRAFT AND INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS, JOURNALS, MAGAZINES, COMIC STRIPS, NEWSPAPERS, MANUALS, BROCHURES, AND PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIALS ALL ON THE SUBJECTS OF GROUND VEHICLE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS, GEARBOX MODELING AND ANALYSIS, VEHICLE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS, SHAFTS, BEARINGS AND GEAR ANALYSIS AND GEAR REFINEMENT FOR MANUFACTURING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR SERVICES FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PERIPHERALS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | DESKTOP PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND OFFSET PRINTING FOR OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELD OF ENGINEERING TO TRANSMISSION AND ENGINEERING COMPANIES; COMPUTER TRAINING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING SERVICES, NAMELY, MAGAZINES FEATURING SUBJECTS RELATING TO THE MANUFACTURING OF GROUND VEHICLES, AIRCRAFT AND INDUSTRIAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, GEARBOX MODELING, SHAFTS BEARINGS, AND GEAR REFINEMENT FOR MANUFACTURING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; ENGINEERING; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF TRANSMISSION DESIGN; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF TRANSMISSION, GEARBOX, SHAFTS, BEARINGS AND GEARS FOR GROUND VEHICLES, AIRCRAFT AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROMAX TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ROMAX TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ROMAX TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ROMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | NEWR | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS APPROVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |