USPTO serial 75460941
DYNAMIC MID-OCEAN MONEY MARKET FUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNAMIC MID-OCEAN MONEY MARKET FUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5H 4A9, CA
TORONTO, ONTARION, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIDGE M HYMAN
MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | managing mutual funds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DUNNDEE BANCORP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Goodman & Company Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named DYNAMIC MID-OCEAN MONEY MARKET FUND
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |