USPTO serial 75460993
LIVING IN STAMFORD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2000
- Examiner
- QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIVING IN STAMFORD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AVIS FRAZIER-THOMAS
MICHAEL A PARKS TRIBUNE COMPANYLAW DEPT 6TH FL435 N MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60611Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | magazines featuring information regarding life in [Northern Connecticut] * Southwestern Connecticut * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |