USPTO serial 75461229
TRAFFICLED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 2002
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRAFFICLED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC KARICH
ERIC KARICH LAW OFFICE OF ERIC KARICH3151 AIRWAY AVE STE K-105COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | light emitting diode clusters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |