USPTO serial 75461406
MAC-1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAC-1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hamilton, HM12, BM
Hamilton, HM12, BM
GLOBAL CROSSING HOLDINGS LIMITED
HAMILTON, BM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD P. FERRARA
RICHARD P FERRARA FISH & RICHARDSON PC45 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 2800NEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing telecommunications connections and transfer of data, voice, video and other information via a fiber-optic-based network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Global Crossing Holdings Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Global Crossing Holdings Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBAL CROSSING HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named MAC-1
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |