USPTO serial 75461409
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
GLOBAL CROSSING HOLDINGS LIMITED
HAMILTON, BM
Hamilton, HM12, BM
Hamilton, HM12, BM
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD P FERRARA
RICHARD P FERRARA FISH & RICHARDSON PC45 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 2800NEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing communications connections and transfer of data, voice, video and other information via a fiber optic-based network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |