USPTO serial 75461645
GENEBLOCS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENEBLOCS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID A RANDALL
JAMES M MCCARTHY MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF300 S WACKER DR STE 3200CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Medicinal and biological product research, development and testing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RIBOZYME PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by RIBOZYME PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GENEBLOCS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |