Drawing for BEYOND BEAUTY

USPTO serial 75461727

BEYOND BEAUTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEYOND BEAUTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HARRIET E PERKINS

HARRIET E PERKINS SIEDEL GONDA LAVORGNA & MONACO PC2 PENN CTR PLZ STE 1800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Body lotion, spray body lotion, face cream, face lotion, face wash, body wash, foam bath, bath gel, bath cream, bath soap, body powder, foot lotion, foot cream, non-medicated foot powder, eye cream, eye gel, make-up remover, cologne body spray, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, hair relaxers, and gift sets which include a variety of the foregoing productsACTIVE—
021Bath products, namely, sponges for bathing; loofas for bathing, namely, body scrubbers, back scrubbers and foot scrubbers; nylon mesh body scrubbers, back scrubbers and foot scrubbers; brushes for bathing, namely, body scrubbers, back scrubbers, foot scrubbers and gift sets which include a variety of the foregoing productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 26, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 10, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 24, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance