USPTO serial 75461748
YANKZ!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 12, 2002
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with YANKZ!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lake Charles, LA
LAKE CHARLES, LA
Lake Charles, LA
Lake Charles, LA
LAKE CHARLES, LA
SPORTING INNOVATIONS GROUP, LLC
ATLANTA, GA
Lake Charles, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Grierson
Kevin Grierson Culhane Meadows PLLC2736 Holly Ridge Lane, Suite 201Williamsburg, VA 23185-8358UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Shoe laces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Curet, Stephanie H.
- Other trademarks owned by W.O.W., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Curet, William D.
- Other trademarks owned by Curet, Stephanie H.
- Other trademarks owned by W.O.W., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPORTING INNOVATIONS GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Curet, William D.
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named YANKZ!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 7, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 7, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |