USPTO serial 75461859
T TECORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2807590Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2004
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with T TECORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen D. Hayes
Stephen D. Hayes TECORE, Inc.7061 Columbia Gateway DriveColumbia, MD 21046UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Project management, namely, telecommunications computer network design for others; computer consultation, namely, analysis of telecommunications system traffic; design and integration of telecommunications computer systems and networks | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |