USPTO serial 75461959
THE VOICE OF E-BUSINESS AND INTERNET TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE VOICE OF E-BUSINESS AND INTERNET TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY P FRAELICH
TIMOTHY P FRAELICH JONES DAY REAVIS & POGUEN POINT-901 LAKESIDE AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, MAGAZINES, MAGAZINE SUPPLEMENTS, MAGAZINE SECTIONS, NEWSLETTERS, PAMPHLETS, BROCHURES, EXHIBITION PROGRAMS, REPORTS, BOOKS AND DIRECTORIES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES | ABANDONED | Feb 2, 1998 |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING ON LINE PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, MAGAZINES, MAGAZINE SUPPLEMENTS, MAGAZINE SECTIONS, NEWSLETTERS, PAMPHLETS, BROCHURES, EXHIBITION PROGRAMS, REPORTS, BOOKS AND DIRECTORIES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES | ABANDONED | Feb 2, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |