USPTO serial 75462017
LIL' TIGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIL' TIGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stroudsburg, PA
Stroudsburg, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES A WILKINSON
CHARLES A. WILKINSONP.O. BOX 1426BETHLEHEM, PA 18016-1426UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Stationery featuring educational and adventure themes for children | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, t-shirts, sweat shirts, sweatpants, sweaters, dresses, hats, coats, jackets, caps, rain coats, belts, mittens, gloves, shoes, sneakers, boots, slippers, sandals, nightgowns, robes, pajamas, sleep wear, underwear, socks, and swimwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |