Drawing for REVIEWIT

USPTO serial 75462060

REVIEWIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REVIEWIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KERRY LONG

KERRY LONG BIDCOM, INC201 MISSION ST STE 2900SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for professionals in graphic intensive fields for use in communication and collaboration of design content, and manuals packaged as a unitACTIVEDec 7, 1998
042computer services, namely, integration of computer systems and networks for use by professionals and organizations for the purpose of storing, retrieving, maintaining and tracking registered contentACTIVEDec 7, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 26, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 20, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 3, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance