USPTO serial 75462365
MALIBU SMOOTHIE THE ORIGINAL AND THE BEST SUPER HEALTHY, DELICIOUS AND SATISFYING FRUIT SMOOTHIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MALIBU SMOOTHIE THE ORIGINAL AND THE BEST SUPER HEALTHY, DELICIOUS AND SATISFYING FRUIT SMOOTHIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A CORDIER
MICHAEL A CORDIER ROBBINS & GREEN PA3300 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1800PHOENIX, AZ 85012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MEAL REPLACEMENT AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENT NON-DAIRY POWDERED DRINK MIXES; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | FRUIT AND VEGETABLE BLENDED JUICE DRINKS; FRUIT SMOOTHIES; POWDER USED IN THE PREPARATION OF FRUIT SMOOTHIES; FRUIT FLAVORED DRINKS | ACTIVE | May 1, 1997 |
| 035 | RESTAURANTS FEATURING FRUIT, VEGETABLE AND NON-DAIRY DRINKS, DRINK MIXES, POWDERS TO MAKE DRINKS AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS; FRANCHISING, NAMELY, OFFERING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF CLOTHING VEGETABLE AND NON-DAIRY DRINKS, DRINK MIXES, POWDERS TO MAKE DRINKS AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | May 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Surf City Squeeze, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MALIBU SMOOTHIE THE ORIGINAL AND THE BEST SUPER HEALTHY, DELICIOUS AND SATISFYING FRUIT SMOOTHIES
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |