Drawing for MEETING DEPOT A WORLD OF IDEAS

USPTO serial 75462403

MEETING DEPOT A WORLD OF IDEAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEETING DEPOT A WORLD OF IDEAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIK B CHERDAK

MARK H TIDMAN AND ERIK B CHERDAK ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 24, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 17, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 25, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 24, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 7, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 20031.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Jan 21, 20031.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Jan 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 22, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 14, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance