CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for INDIAN ROSE

USPTO serial 75462676

INDIAN ROSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDIAN ROSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE M BORABABY

GEORGE M BORABABY PATTON BOGGS LLP2550 M ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018goods made of leather and imitation leather, namely, attache cases, travel bags, shopping bags, bandoliers, beach bags, hat boxes for travel made of leather or leather board, briefcases, business and/or calling card cases, hunters' game bags, handbags, key cases, wallets, purses, rucksacs, school satchels, school bags, suitcases, tool bags sold empty, travelling trunks, umbrellas, valises, vanity cases sold emptyACTIVE—
025clothing and footwear, namely, bandanas, neckerchiefs, bath robes, bathing suits, bath slippers, bathing caps, beach clothes, beach shoes, belts, berets, boots, caps, clothing for gymnastics, coats, frocks, gloves, gymnastic shoes, hats, half-boots, headbands, hosiery, jackets, jerseys, neckties, overalls, overcoats, pants, parkas, pullovers, pajamas, sandals, scarves, shirts, shoes, singlets, skirts, slippers, socks, stockings, suits, sweaters, tee-shirts, trousers, trouser straps, underpants, undershirts, vests, waistcoatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 11, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 11, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 9, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 9, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 21, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 20, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2010IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 18, 2010INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Nov 18, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 9, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 9, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 26, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 23, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 22, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 14, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 14, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 22, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 30, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 22, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance