USPTO serial 75462804
KOSKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2398775Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2000
- Examiner
- CROCKETT, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KOSKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S EGBERT
John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices412 Main St.. 7th FloorHouston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Crushed sesame seeds, jam, peanut butter, hazelnut butter, glaceed fruit, candied dried fruit, chestnut glacee, fruit topping syrup | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 29, 1998 |
| 030 | Bakery goods, namely, halvah and Turkish delight; honey, sweet pastries, candy, milk candy, fruit candy, lemon candy, strawberry candy, orange candy, caramel, fondant, cacao candy, chocolate candy, toffee, coffee candy, aromatic candy, peppermint candy, cream candy, almond candy, coconut candy, sugar candy, and crystallized sugar | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 29, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERTER HELVA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by MERTER HELVA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KOSKA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |