Drawing for AFS ROSEBUD2 TECHNOLOGY FOR FLORISTS

USPTO serial 75463127

AFS ROSEBUD2 TECHNOLOGY FOR FLORISTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AFS ROSEBUD2 TECHNOLOGY FOR FLORISTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ

SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR ACCOUNTING APPLICATIONS FOR THE FLORISTS INDUSTRYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance