USPTO serial 75463242
GEAR ROLLER HOCKEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEAR ROLLER HOCKEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J SCHAAP
ROBERT J SCHAAP ROBERT J SCHAAP PC21241 VENTURA BLVD STE 188WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | SPORTING GOODS FOR ICE HOCKEY AND ROLLER HOCKEY, NAMELY, SKATES, PROTECTIVE PADS FOR SHOULDERS AND ELBOWS, HARD SHELL GLOVES FOR HOCKEY, GOAL KEEPER PADS, BLOCKER MITTENS, PUCKS, STICKS, BALLS, AND HOCKEY SKATE BLADES | ACTIVE | Sep 11, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |