Drawing for PRESTIGE

USPTO serial 75463312

PRESTIGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRESTIGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEITH W MEDANSKY

KEITH W MEDANSKY RUDNICK & WOLFEP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029texturized vegetable protein bits having a bacon flavor; cooked eggs; prepared, packaged or frozen entrees and meals consisting primarily of eggs, fruit, vegetables; chili; broths, soups, liquid soup concentrates and dry soup mixes; chowders, liquid chowder concentrates and dry chowder mixes; dried beans; processed potato nuggets and shredded, sliced and mashed potatoes; fruit and vegetable sauces and purees; fruit and vegetable salads; pickled vegetables; processed olives, processed pimentos, processed nuts, apple butter, fruit-based and nut-based toppings; snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts or raisins all for sale and distribution to foodservice operationsACTIVE—
030relishes and cream sauces, all for sale and distribution to foodservice operationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance