Drawing for CEV

USPTO serial 75463330

CEV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CEV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL R ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900RIVERDALE, NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRIC CABLES AND ELECTRIC WIRINGS, ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT BOARDS, CIRCUIT BREAKERS, ELECTRIC PLUGS, REVOLUTION COUNTERS AND SPEEDOMETERSACTIVE—
011LIGHTS FOR VEHICLES, HEADLIGHTS FOR VEHICLES, LAMPS FOR VEHICLES, ELECTRIC LIGHT BULBS FOR VEHICLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 31, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 12, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 27, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 7, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance