Drawing for PERFECT LADY

USPTO serial 75463387

PERFECT LADY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PERFECT LADY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MORTON J ROSENBERG

MORTON J ROSENBERG ROSENBERG KLEIN & BILKER3444 ELLICOTT CTR DRSTE 105ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING BEAUTY SALON SERVICES FEATURING HAIR STYLING, FACIALS, MASSAGE AND SAUNA SERVICE, AND CONSULTATION IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, PROVIDING WEIGHT REDUCTION DIET PLANNING SERVICES AND CONSULTING IN CONNECTION THEREWITHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2000ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 12, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 12, 2000OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 11, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 12, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance