USPTO serial 75463417
U.S. GAMES SYSTEMS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with U.S. GAMES SYSTEMS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS J MOORE
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS625 SLATERS LN 4TH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | BOARD GAMES; CARD GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |