Drawing for AQUILA MINING SYSTEMS LTD.

USPTO serial 75463519

AQUILA MINING SYSTEMS LTD.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2464823Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2001
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with AQUILA MINING SYSTEMS LTD.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christie Baty Heinze

Christie Baty Heinze Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New Yor Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Advanced, computer-based monitoring, control and guidance systems for drills and cable shovels, namely, computers, computer peripherals and software moduals for production monitoring, material recognition, drill control maintenance, guidance, load weighing and shovel guidance; data information management systems, namely, computers, computer peripherals and software moduals used for the collection, transmission, and analysis of data and information in the mining industrySECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2008C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 19, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 27, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 31, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 24, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 3, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance