Drawing for AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75464419

AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT C FABER

ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK FABER GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF COURSES AT THE UNIVERSITY LEVEL, NAMELY, INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAMS RELATED TO MANAGEMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 1999PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 7, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 24, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance