USPTO serial 75464452
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
S-711 34 Lindesberg, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. Eichler
PETER M EICHLER CROSBY HEAFEY ROACH & MAY PC1901 AVE OF THE STARS STE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric and electronic apparatus and instruments and apparatus and instruments for measuring, signaling, monitoring and life-saving, namely aerials, masts for wireless aerials, batteries and battery chargers, detectors for tracking animals, remote control for detectors, navigational instruments, radios and tracking devices, amplifiers, dog whistles, loudspeakers; electrical control panels for remote controls, detectors, navigational instruments, sounding apparatus and machines, radios, transmitters and receivers, tracking devices, navigational instruments and sounding apparatus and machines for tracking animals (electric), radios, radiotelegraphy sets comprised of head phones, microphones, transmitters and receivers, transmitters and receivers of electric signals, radio transmitters, prerecorded computer electronic surveillance programs; apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproduction of sound and images all for and regarding tracking animals, tracking devices, namely for tracking animals and direction finders | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |