USPTO serial 75464637
IMPARTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'HARA, CHAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMPARTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRIS WILSON
CHRIS WILSON ARNOLD & PORTER555 12TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer systems comprised of computer hardware, peripherals and computer programs and related printed documentation in the field of investigations for use in employment background screening, searching credit and financial information, performing business and individual identification and verification, and searching federal, state and county court records | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | investigations services, namely, detective investigations, private investigations, missing persons investigations, and pre-employment background investigations, and surveillance services related to all of the foregoing; detective investigations involving claims of sexual harassment, workers compensation, employment discrimination and insurance claims; national security background investigations; compiling inventories of personal items for individuals for insurance purposes; personal inventorying by means of videotaping and household items for security and insurance purposes; undercover investigation and related consultation in the field of retail store operations; investigation and related consultation in the field of the level of security of businesses; design of electronic security systems for others; administering polygraph tests for others; reviewing standards and practices to ensure compliance with securities, environmental, immigration, insurance, gaming industry and transportation laws and regulation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |