Drawing for MAYAN PALACE

USPTO serial 75464692

MAYAN PALACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2307064Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 11, 2000
Examiner
SUK, HAE P
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAYAN PALACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott R. Erikson

SCOTT R ERIKSON INTERSERVE BUSINESS SERVICES INC4104 SAVANNAH CTCOLLEYVILLE, TX 76034UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042hotel and resort servicesEXPIREDJun 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 29, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 29, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 10, 2006815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 10, 2006E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2000R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 19, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance