USPTO serial 75465162
ONC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
READING BERKSHIRE RG1 1AX, GB
READING BERKSHIRE RG1 1AX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURA GENOVESE MILLER
LAURA GENOVESE MILLER WOODCOCK WASHBURN KURTZ ET AL1 LIBERTY PL 46TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and parts therefor; computer programs for verification of compatibility with multi-vendor computer systems; computer programs for portability, namely for computer compatibility verification and quality control; diagnostics software for determining whether third party computer software and/or systems comply with certain standards as to the compatibility and/or interoperability of the software/system with other software and/or systems in a networked computer environment; computer programs for networking computers; computer software, namely utility programs, operating systems programs, interface programs, computer graphics programs, and data management programs; program application and development software; computer programs for use in database management; computer software for developing other software, translating programming languages into machine languages, creating databases and creating spreadsheets; data processing apparatus and instruments, namely computers for data processing, computers for word processing, computer keyboards, visual display units for computers and microprocessors | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | instructional leaflets and bulletins pertaining to computers, computer software and computer programming; newsletters and printed instructional manuals pertaining to computers, computer software and computer programming; teaching materials, namely, printed instructional materials relating to computers, computer software, and computer programming; computer program directories; computer paper; blank computer cards; blank paper tapes for computers; and computer printer ribbons | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer consultation; computer hardware, computer software and computer system advisory services relating to compatibility and open systems; computer programming for others; computer code and computer compatibility verification for others; computer software research and design for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by X/OPEN COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by X/OPEN COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ONC
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |