USPTO serial 75465391
D DESCARTES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2003
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with D DESCARTES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Descartes Systems Group Inc. The
Waterloo, Ontario, CA
Descartes Systems Group Inc. The
Waterloo, Ontario, CA
Descartes Systems Group Inc. The
Waterloo, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D.Michael Bean
D.Michael Bean GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP50 Queen Street North, P.O. Box 2248Suite 1020Kitchener, Ontario, N2H6M2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for facilitating supply chain exeaction and distribution and for monitoring and tracking supply chain activities in the fields of wholesale and retail marketing and sale of products and services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Descartes Systems Group Inc. The
- Other trademarks owned by Descartes Systems Group Inc. The
- Other trademarks owned by Descartes Systems Group Inc. The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named D DESCARTES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |