USPTO serial 75465399
EBUSINESS MONTHLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EBUSINESS MONTHLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREA VAN KAMPEN
ANDREA VAN KAMPEN ZIFF-DAVIS PUBLISHING CO1 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronics publications recorded on cd-roms, video and audio cassettes, computer disks and DVDs, namely, magazines and newspapers and sections and columns thereof and supplements thereto, journals, newsletters, directories, pamphlets, brochures, indices and catalogues featuring information on computers, computing, computer hardware, computer software, computer technology, computer networks and networking, a worldwide computer information network, information technology, communications, communications technology, high technology, interactive and online services, entertainment, computer and video games, television programming, finance and news and a wide range of general interest information | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, magazines and newspapers and sections and columns thereof and supplements thereto, journals, newsletters, directories, pamphlets, brochures, indices and catalogues in the fields of computers, computing, computer hardware, computer software, computer technology, computer networks and networking, a worldwide computer information network, information technology, communications, communications technology, high technology, interactive and online services, entertainment, computer and video games, television programming, finance and news and a wide range of general interest information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online publications, namely, magazines and newspapers and sections and columns thereof and supplements thereto, journals, newsletters, directories, pamphlets, brochures, indices and catalogues featuring information about computers, computing, computer hardware, computer software, computer technology, computer networks and networking, a worldwide computer information network, information technology, communications, telecommunications, communications technology, high technology, interactive and online services, entertainment, computer and video games, television programming, finance and news and a wide range of general interest information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |