USPTO serial 75465441
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rehovot 76123, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AVITAL TALLY EITAN
AVITAL (TALLY) EITAN C/O TK ASSOCIATES TERRY KANNOFSKY2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 300ARLINGTON, VA 22202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO FACILITATE COMMUNICATION OVER INTERCONNECTED COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |