USPTO serial 75465561
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL R SWARTZ
205 ROYAL OAK AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15235UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Resilient elastomeric material sold as component of sporting goods, namely, golf clubs and tennis racquets | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 11, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |