USPTO serial 75465637
DOMINATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOMINATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
IRA M SIEGEL
IRA M SIEGEL LAW OFFICE OF IRA M SIEGEL433 N CAMDEN DR STE 970BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-4426UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail clothing stores, sporting goods stores, home shopping services in the field of sporting goods and clothing by means of television, and computerized on-line retail services in the field of sporting goods and clothing | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment in the nature of hockey games, and instruction in the field of hockey, entertainment in the nature of a web site in the field of sports, entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of sports and in the field of comedy | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | creating web sites for others, and restaurant and bar services, hotels and resort hotels, and casinos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |