USPTO serial 75465644
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
King of Prussia, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Virginia R Richard
VIRGINIA R RICHARD KANE, DALSIMER, SULLIVAN, KURUCZ20TH FL 711 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for psychotherapy treatment assessment outcomes measurement and healthcare management | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Manuals, brochures and patient information and data forms for use in connection with psychotherapy treatment analysis and outcomes measurement | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management services in the field of healthcare | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and consulting services in the field of psychotherapy treatment assessment and outcomes measurement including monitoring and quantifying the progress of outpatient counseling and psychotherapy | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |