USPTO serial 75465714
BIKINI VILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, CHRISTINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIKINI VILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HURBET, QUEBEC, CA
St-Hubert, Quebec, CA
St-Hubert, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD STRASBURGER & PRICE LLPP O BOX 50100DALLAS, TX 75250UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely magazines featuring fashion and swimwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | beach bags and tote bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Men's, ladies's and children's bathing suits, swimwear, shorts, cover-ups, leg warmers, dancing shoes, exercise suits, hats, sandals, bathing caps, and beach and pool footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail stores featuring men's, ladies' and children's bathing suits, swimwear, shorts, cover-ups, leg lawrmers,dancing shoes, exercise suits, hats sandals, bathing caps and beach and pool footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 2706296 CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Bikini Village Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bikini Village Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BIKINI VILLAGE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |