USPTO serial 75465934
DINOBRUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOH, JAY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DINOBRUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A PAINTER
MICHAEL A PAINTER ISAACMAN KAUFMAN & PAINTER PC8484 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 850BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | toothbrush | ACTIVE | Jan 27, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |