USPTO serial 75465988
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN JOSE, CA
St-Laurent, Quebec, CA
St-Laurent, Quebec, CA
St-Laurent, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allyn Taylor
ALLYN TAYLOR DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP2000 UNIVERSITY AVEEAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in document format support, namely, document display, document printing, file access, network file access, linking files, markup, all in multiple file formats, consolidation of files; viewing, downloading, and printing files from a global computer network; and viewing, copying and printing e-mail attachments to documents | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1989 |
| 041 | computer education and training services, namely, courses and seminars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1989 |
| 042 | technical support services for others in the field of computers; computer consultation; custom design of computer software for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |