USPTO serial 75466161
PARADEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARADEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK J LISS
MARK J LISS LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER LTD2 PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 7, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |