USPTO serial 75466533
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK C STEPHENSON
PATRICK C STEPHENSON MCGRATH N MULLIN & KRATZ, PC1400 ONE CENTRAL PARK PLZ222 S 15 STOMAHA, NE 68102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamins; nutritional supplements; meal replacement beverages; meal replacement beverage mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Frozen, refrigerated and/or prepared dinners, entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of beef, poultry, seafood and/or vegetables; seafood; fish fillets; fish steaks; fish portions; fish sticks; beef; beef cuts; pork; pork cuts; poultry; poultry cuts; poultry portions; soup; soup mixes; stew; chili; ground beef; ground pork; ground poultry; processed meats; lunch meats; frankfurters; non-dairy creamer; whipped toppings; cheese; sour cream; cream cheese; jam; jelly; peanut spread; fruit salads; vegetable salads; garden salads; potato salads; chicken salads; tuna salads; crab salads; imitation crab salads; salad oil; create-your-own salad kits and/or salad components consisting primarily of sliced, cubed, diced, shredded and/or cut ham, chicken, poultry, cheese, processed lettuce and/or vegetables; yogurt; fruit chips; potato chips; vegetable dips, excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Frozen, refrigerated and/or prepared dinners, entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; bread; breakfast cereal; oatmeal; sandwiches; namely, hamburgers, hotdogs and fish; pasta; pasta sauce; spaghetti sauce; tomato sauce; seafood sauce; salsa; tortilla chips; pizza; pudding; pre-cooked, ready-to-eat, frozen bread having a meat, cheese and/or vegetable filling; cookies; crackers; frozen dessert pies; frozen dessert cakes; frozen yogurt; ice cream; syrup topping for ice cream; pasta salads; pasta salads with vegetables; pasta salad with chicken; salad dressing; seasoned coating mixes for beef, pork, poultry and/or seafood; popped popcorn | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unpopped popcorn | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | fruit juices; vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | food kiosk services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | cafe services; cafeteria services; restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |