USPTO serial 75466538
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK C STEPHENSON
MCGRATH N MULLIN & KRATZ PC222 S 15TH ST STE 1400OMAHA, NE 68102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamins; nutritional supplements; meal replacement beverages; meal replacement beverage mixes | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | Frozen, refrigerated and/or prepared dinners, entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of beef, poultry, seafood and/or vegetables; seafood; fish fillets; fish steaks; fish portions; fish sticks; beef; beef cuts; pork; pork cuts; poultry; poultry cuts; poultry portions; soup; soup mixes; stew; chili; ground beef; ground pork; ground poultry; processed meats; lunch meats; frankfurters; non-dairy creamer; whipped toppings; cheese; sour cream; cream cheese; jam; jelly; peanut spread; fruit salads; vegetable salads; garden salads; potato salads; chicken salads; tuna salads; crab salads; imitation crab salads; salad oil; create-your-own salad kits and/or salad components consisting primarily of sliced, cubed, diced, shredded and/or cut ham, chicken, poultry, cheese, processed lettuce and/or vegetables; yogurt; fruit chips; potato chips; vegetable dips, excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Frozen, refrigerated and/or prepared dinners, entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; bread; breakfast cereal; oatmeal; sandwiches; namely, hamburgers, hotdogs and fish; pasta; pasta sauce; spaghetti sauce; tomato sauce; seafood sauce; salsa; tortilla chips; pizza; pudding; pre-cooked, ready-to-eat, frozen bread having a meat, cheese and/or vegetable filling; cookies; crackers; frozen dessert pies; frozen dessert cakes; frozen yogurt; ice cream; syrup topping for ice cream; pasta salads; pasta salads with vegetables; pasta salad with chicken; salad dressing; seasoned coating mixes for beef, pork, poultry and/or seafood; popped popcorn | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | Unpopped popcorn | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | fruit juices; vegetable juices | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | food kiosk services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | cafe services; cafeteria services; restaurant services | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |