Drawing for QUANTUM

USPTO serial 75466634

QUANTUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRIEGEL, ADAM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with QUANTUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LINDA L BERKOWITZ

LINDA L BERKOWITZ LADAS & PARRY26 E 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009BURGLAR, FIRE, PERSONAL SECURITY, THEFT AND ANTI-INTRUSION ALARMS AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLS FOR SUCH ALARMS; SECURITY AND SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PASSIVE INFRA-RED ANTI-INTRUSION, MOTION AND HEAT DETECTORS; AND PARTS THEREFORABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 30, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 30, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 30, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 23, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 12, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 11, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance